Archive for March, 2009

Mar 30

is this a real camera?


The above photographs were shot last week in Malibu with an Argus 75 camera. It’s a funny little twin lens box camera with an unusually bright top viewfinder and nothing to adjust. Really. Not even the usual sun/shade or distance adjustments you will find on any other simple camera out there.
This camera makes the Holga looks like an awfully sophisticated camera.
Since, like mentioned before, I have many cameras, by the time I pick up a camera again I need to re-learn how to work it. And so I had a moment of panic when I realized this camera takes 620 film which is not manufactured anymore (I suspect the ones available online from different suppliers are probably 120 film respooled onto 620 spool). This can be a problem… But wait a minute, I know I took pictures using this camera in the past. hmmm…. how did I do it? Oh yes, it all comes back now. These cameras are like riding bicycle; once you figure it out you never forget how it’s done. Anyway, the solution is quite simple: 120 film can be trimmed to fit inside this camera and for the receiving spool I insert an original 620 spool I got on eBay.
Note to myself: make sure the 620 spool is returned from the lab after the film had been processed.

15
comments

Mar 26

Help! I have too many cameras!

By now, after bargain hunting through garage sales, thrift stores and eBay, I think I piled up about 30 cameras. yes about 30, hmmmm. Maybe even more, but see, most of them, are a few dollars bargains of wonderfully lovely classic cameras I could not pass up.
And I really love each and every one of these classics but having so many cameras created three immediate problems:
1) storage
2) dust (I can imagine quite a few great things I can do with my free time rather than dust old cameras)
3) which camera do I choose when I want to take pictures?
#1 and #2 were solved when I decided to keep the cameras in a big drawer instead of arranging them nicely on shelves like I did at first.
#3 is still a problem. Sometimes.
Sometimes I arrange a few chosen cameras in front of me and agonize over which one I should take this time. At other times I just know which one I want. It’s a brownie day. It’s a Lubitel kind of a day. It’s just the right day for a Minolta SRT.
Choosing a camera is a lot like choosing a record to listen to. Sometimes it’s Pink Floyd, sometimes all I want to listen to is Boston and when I’m homesick I just want to drown in the sound of Horslips.
So in the last couple of weeks I loaded my Olympus 35RC with 400ASA film and had a blast shooting around the city. (And right now my record player is playing Pink Floyd)

Century City.  Olympus 35RC

5
comments

Mar 23

What does a photographer dream about?

Every once in a while I wake up from a terrifying nightmare;
I’m traveling to a new place, another city, sometimes it’s San Francisco, or New York, sometimes it’s a city I haven’t been to yet, but very often the dream takes place in Jerusalem, in particular the old city of Jerusalem. So I’m there, and I’m so happy as I always am when I travel and usually everything is just perfect and the moment is just right to take an amazing picture. But oh, no! I don’t have my camera! Apparently I left the camera somewhere behind (the hotel, the house, the bus, the subway, the airport). Now what? I usually spend the rest of the dream trying to retrieve my camera, overcoming obstacles (they always like to pile up when I’m in a panic mode), cracking impossible challenges, and trying everything I can possibly think of to find my beloved camera. And in case you are rooting for me, I’m sorry to disappoint you but I never really recover my camera and often I wake up at some point, quite happy to find out it was just another one of these disturbed dreams.
And I wonder, is it just me or do most photographers have such frightening dreams about their vanishing cameras?

the ghost of George Washington, Boston MA

the ghost of general George Washington / Downtown Boston
… but I know that somewhere beyond it, in dim lights, over the rainbow, lays the real Boston where General Washington was called upon to take command over the continental army.

Camera: Nikon N75
Film: Fuji RHP III

6
comments

Mar 16

good day bad memory

When I discovered a printout of this picture, I just couldn’t remember how on earth I achieved this distinctive effect. I suppose I created it about two years or so ago and that’s apparently way too long for someone with a demanding schedule as myself to be able to remember such fine details (and obviously I’d rather not blame it on age). But finally after pondering between inkjet transfer and textured layer I had a moment of rare recollection and I realized this picture was in fact featured in my latest book;
I am not an artist
In the book under the picture it says:
Camera: Holga Film: Kodak 400VC
Place: Downtown San Francisco
Technique: negative scanned through a clear sheet protector.

There you go.

downtown San Francisco

4
comments

Mar 10

I love image transfers

Do you know how sometimes old photography books have pictures with a mysterious silver metallic shine? I’m not really sure how it was done. Was it done by a special developing process or is it the result of printing into some sort of silverfish paper?
In any case, the other day I was looking at such a book at the library, admiring the silver-metallic gloss, when yet another weird idea was quietly developing in my head. Why not try transfering an image into a metallic surface, such as… hmmm how about aluminum foil?
OK, yes, maybe a bit of an unusual idea and it’s not that I expected the transfer will look like these old photographs but once an idea is stuck in my head, that’s it, I have to try it.
So the next day I transferred a Xerox copy of a Holga picture from Boston (Faneuil Hall/Quincy Market) into the common household aluminum foil. I waited about 24 hours (sometimes even I show signs of abnormal patience) and then separated the foil from the printout. The result is pretty cool and it provides image transfer with a whole new dimension and additional possibilities.

Faneuil Hall/Quincy Market.  Boston, MA

7
comments

Mar 07

When do you photograph?

I’m not sure why but from the beginning I indexed my photos using the following order:
year –> month –> camera –> place or theme –> name(place)Date.jpg
I’m sure you can come up with much better systems, maybe using tags and labels but anyway this one works great for me mainly because this method lets me locate my images quickly, as by looking at the image file name I immediately know in which folder it’s located.
Yesterday I was curious to see which time of year I take more pictures. I think I already knew the answer though. And thanks to this method of organizing my pictures it was an easy question to answer.
And by the way, this is not going to include pictures I take when traveling, because this is when I go wild with my cameras, so I’m just not counting these binges in my ”when does Nitsa take the most photos” study.
Ok, so the answer is: Winter.
Must be all the drama of the rain, mist, puddles and spectacular skies that captures my attention, though I’m sure the results would have been quite different if I didn’t live in sunny L.A. where rain is always an astonishing event.

Rain in San Francisco. 2005

1
comments

Mar 01

Make earth friendly photo art

part of a mixed media image transfer

After a good deal of experimentation with mixed-media-transfer I cannot but conclude there’s no substitute to using Xerox photocopies instead of inkjet printouts. Not only the Xerox transfer is more stable and therefore you have more control over it (which can also be a bad thing if you like the unexpected) but also the transfer is guarantee to last longer than an inkjet transfer will. The problem with the ink is that it has a shorter life span and sadly it does not handle water very well, so just a little bit of moisture can do great harm to your masterpiece.
Honestly, I’m not that happy about these findings mainly because I very much rather using inkjet printouts as I can print out whatever I want on the fly, and that’s how I prefer working, without extra planning. But it is what it is.
Anyway, the main reason I’m writing about mixed-media-transfer yet again, is that I would like to recommend that if you are interested in doing image transfers, do consider the mixed-media thing. I myself like it very much because of the special appearance of the end result and because it involves the therapeutic process of tearing, assembling and pasting. I often use found objects, meaning movie tickets, used stamps, spam mail, newspapers etc. Actually one of my favorite things to use is the little paper bag they put my sushi in at Whole Foods, it has red stripes and it states “stay cool” so I try to stay cool and I use these paper bags in every mixed media piece I make. The reason I mention it is that not only the mixed-media-transfer has a unique appearance; it is also Earth friendly and a much better way to recycle; no doubt it is the most energy efficient recycling method.
And by the way, before you transfer the image onto these mixed media things, you can scan them and use them as backgrounds with your texture layer technique.

1
comments