Post details: DISASTER!

04/20/07

Permalink Filed under: Announcement Posted by conglom @ 01:50:09 am

DISASTER!

Well, I'm an idiot. I kept saying I would back up my drives next weekend, and next weekend turned into next month, next year, and here I am over two years later...can anyone guess where this story is going?

ALL of my street photos are gone. The drive is completely corrupted. I've run a few different file restoration utilities on it and they don't see any directory or file structure at all -- nothing. So, I'm going to have to take the drive in to a pro to see if they can pull anything off (for a large amount of money, I'm sure).

This is the one area where all you film shooters will get no arguments from me about the weaknesses of digital...but it was my own fault. The good news is that I do still have all of my hiking pictures from around Arizona and some California...but there are sooooo many others that are probably just gone.

One of my friends said, "Look at the bright side...god's telling you to get a better camera." And in my depression, I might just take that advice...

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: martin [Member] · http://www.theurbanlandscape.co.uk
really sorry to hear that. i've had a few near misses in the past, but thankfully with minimal loss. however sometimes it take a situation like this to make you realise the true value of your images.

hopefully everyone who reads your post will take on board what has happened and reveiw their own backup procedures. this is not only relevant to digital files, many film users keep all their prints and negitive in the same location, you should consider seperating negs and prints ( by physical location if possible).

As far as digital is concerned consider purcasing an additional external usb drive for backup, 300GB cost less than £100 ( $180 or so) make a complete backup after any major shoots or changes. you may also consider storing your files on an external web server, most ISP offer unlimited webspace and the files do not need to be published if you do not want to share them.

last couple of points ( promise).
if you decide you really want your files back, make sure you use a reputable company for recovery not just the local IT company ( trust me thats who i work for ;) ). i have used data clinic before http://www.dataclinic.co.uk/ they manage to recover some rather large databases for my company before. generally these companies will change to analyse the disk give you a list of recoverable files then charge recover per MegaByte.

finally don't think it's a new camera you need but a new PC ( with some extra disks)

hope you get somewhere with recovery, let us know how you get on.

cheers
martin

Permalink 04/20/07 @ 04:44
Comment from: nitsa [Member] · http://blog.nonphotography.com/
I hope you find a way to recover your files, I hear it's possible so don't give up quite yet.
As far as storing film, don't forget about fires and floods. Martin suggested saperating negatives in different locations but that only protects some of the negatives and not all.
I scan my film in high resolution and make a few back up copies on DVDs which I give to a couple of friends, one of them is in a different state.
so if I ever lose the physical negatives I will still have the digital copy which is obviously better than nothing.

what about the photos you took in New York? any survivors?
Permalink 04/20/07 @ 09:43
Comment from: conglom [Member] · http://www.artistlies.com
New York is completely lost unless I get the drive back -- however, it's looking pretty good at this point. I am trying some utilities I found online and one of them (R-Studio) said that it could recover most everything. So, I paid the 80 bucks for it -- a small price if you ask me -- and it's currently trying to copy over what it can. I see the filenames flash by on the screen and it LOOKS like it's doing a good job so far, so we will see! I'll update you when it's done...it was a big drive so it'll take a while.

Martin, the funny thing is that I JUST got a new computer last week. But, the drive the photos were on is an external one that I've had for quite some time. And yes, I know the camera isn't related to the problem at all...it would have been more of a comforting purchase than a practical one. :)
Permalink 04/20/07 @ 14:54
Comment from: conglom [Member] · http://www.artistlies.com
Well, I got lucky -- it took almost 15 hours to restore the files to a clean drive, but that's fine with me! There were only four files (out of 77000 on the disk) that it couldn't restore, and I don't think any of them were photos. So, I'm a very happy man today!
Permalink 04/21/07 @ 14:47
Comment from: martin [Member] · http://www.theurbanlandscape.co.uk
glad to hear that, sounds like 80 bucks well spent. lesson learnt i guess, i'm off to backup my pics just now!

cheers
martin

ps. you should still treat yourself to that camera :)
Permalink 04/21/07 @ 16:17
Comment from: nitsa [Member] · http://blog.nonphotography.com/
:)
Permalink 04/23/07 @ 09:07

Comments are closed for this post.

If you like street photography this is the place for you to share your ideas and experience, to ask questions and post your street photos for discussion.
You can simply add a comment or register and begin posting.

Please note: it usually takes about 24 hours to be approved and get permission to post.

How to make a post
How to avoid spam

Login

March 2008
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
<<  <   >  >>
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31

Search

Syndicate this blog XML

What is RSS?

powered by
b2evolution